This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
en:thc_recht:umgang [2023/02/21 15:17] – sos | en:thc_recht:umgang [2024/03/27 08:56] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<WRAP left lirot 100%> | <WRAP left lirot 100%> | ||
===== Penalties ===== | ===== Penalties ===== | ||
- | In the red boxes, we describe the **range of punishments** that belong to the described topic, usually with an example, so that we can show what is in store for those affected. Ultimately (except for the [[en: | + | In the red boxes, we describe the **range of punishments** that belong to the described topic, usually with an example, so that we can show what is in store for those affected. Ultimately (except for the [[en: |
</ | </ | ||
<WRAP clear></ | <WRAP clear></ | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
From a content of 1.0 % THC, THC-containing products are prohibited in Switzerland. The Narcotics Act (NarcA) thus defines the //" | From a content of 1.0 % THC, THC-containing products are prohibited in Switzerland. The Narcotics Act (NarcA) thus defines the //" | ||
- | There are different {{: | + | There are different {{: |
- | Nevertheless, | + | Nevertheless, |
- | Preparations containing more than 1% THC can be taken as [[en: | + | As [[en: |
- | + | ||
- | <WRAP left liblau 100%> | + | |
- | === Innovations as of 1.8.2022 === | + | |
- | Now the facilitations for medical hemp have finally come into force and a new era begins. Doctors can prescribe hemp containing THC without having to apply for an exemption. In the next few years, it will become clearer exactly what this now means in everyday life for sick people. | + | |
- | </ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | \\ | + | |
- | ^ In two overviews we show the different gradations of legality and illegality of THC-containing products (click to enlarge) | + | |
- | | {{: | + | |
- | |{{: | + | |
\\ | \\ | ||
- | In addition to the Narcotics Act and the Regulatory Fines Act (OBG), there are other laws in which THC occurs: e.g. the Food Act or the Road Traffic Act. Driver' | + | In addition to the Narcotics Act and the Fixed Penalties |
All of our comments generally refer to adults unless otherwise noted. Action against [[en: | All of our comments generally refer to adults unless otherwise noted. Action against [[en: | ||
Line 70: | Line 59: | ||
Unauthorized consumption of narcotics is also punishable. However, the consumption and the necessary preparatory acts (such as possession, purchase, cultivation, | Unauthorized consumption of narcotics is also punishable. However, the consumption and the necessary preparatory acts (such as possession, purchase, cultivation, | ||
- | In 2013, the provisions of the regulatory fine bill were added (100 francs fine for cannabis use detected by the police, without questioning / protocol and without fees) and transferred to the OBG as of 1.1.2020. | + | In 2013, the provisions of the fixed penalty |
===== Cantonal differences in repression ===== | ===== Cantonal differences in repression ===== | ||
- | The criminal prosecution is a matter for the cantons. This leads to great differences in the amount of fines imposed on users (ranging from discontinuation of proceedings to fines and fees of 1,000 francs, even for the first time). The regulatory fine were also initially applied very differently in the cantons. | + | The criminal prosecution is a matter for the cantons. This leads to great differences in the amount of fines imposed on users (ranging from discontinuation of proceedings to fines and fees of 1,000 francs, even for the first time). The fixed penalty |
===== Our colored boxes ===== | ===== Our colored boxes ===== | ||
- | In these we summarize the most important points (on this page you will find explanations of their contents). In the purple boxes we give an outlook on future developments. | + | In these we summarize the most important points (on this page you will find explanations of their contents). In the blue boxes we present new developments. In the purple boxes we give an outlook on future developments. |
\\ | \\ | ||
<WRAP left liviolett 100%> | <WRAP left liviolett 100%> | ||
===== Cannabis Pilot Projects ===== | ===== Cannabis Pilot Projects ===== | ||
- | Cannabis dispensary projects in cities have been discussed since 2005. Now the temporary change in the law for this is in force: since May 2021 applications can be submitted, from 2022 the first such projects | + | Cannabis dispensary projects in cities have been discussed since 2005. Now the temporary change in the law for this is in force: since May 2021 applications can be submitted, from 2023 the first such projects |
</ | </ | ||
<WRAP clear> | <WRAP clear> | ||
Line 95: | Line 84: | ||
====== Narcotics Act ====== | ====== Narcotics Act ====== | ||
- | The Narcotics Law (NarcA) regulates all legal issues arising in connection with psychoactive substances. It is a comprehensive and very harsh law. Our collection on legal issues started with this topic. Meanwhile we have 32 folders in use and also collected many other legal topics beyond the NarcA. | + | The Narcotics Law (NarcA) regulates all legal issues arising in connection with psychoactive substances. It is a comprehensive and very harsh law. Our collection on legal issues started with this topic. Meanwhile we have 37 folders in use and also collected many other legal topics beyond the NarcA. |
===== Current narcotics law ===== | ===== Current narcotics law ===== | ||
Line 103: | Line 92: | ||
===== Interpretation of current narcotics law ===== | ===== Interpretation of current narcotics law ===== | ||
- | * [[en: | + | * [[en: |
* [[en: | * [[en: | ||
* [[en: | * [[en: | ||
Line 118: | Line 107: | ||
For a long time, the commissions and councils discussed a revision of the Narcotics Law. Finally, two partial revisions have emerged, both of which have now entered into force. | For a long time, the commissions and councils discussed a revision of the Narcotics Law. Finally, two partial revisions have emerged, both of which have now entered into force. | ||
- | * [[en: | + | * [[en: |
* [[en: | * [[en: | ||
Line 158: | Line 147: | ||
===== Interpretation ===== | ===== Interpretation ===== | ||
- | These general constitutional principles can be interpreted in different ways. In principle, however, the constitutional provisions in Switzerland are accepted more as background noise - but they must not set the pace. That is almost exclusively the responsibility of the law. And there, THC consumption is simply forbidden. Also lawsuits according to the Human Rights Convention | + | These general constitutional principles can be interpreted in different ways. In principle, however, the constitutional provisions in Switzerland are accepted more as background noise - but they must not set the pace. That is almost exclusively the responsibility of the law. And there, THC consumption is simply forbidden. Also lawsuits according to the Human Rights Convention had no chance until today. |
* [[en: | * [[en: |