Normal illegal: consumption private and preparations


Basic prohibition
Narcotics Act NarcA, SR 812.121, Article 19, in PDF (2021) on page 16 f.
Privileged use
Narcotics Act NarcA, SR 812.121, Article 19a, Paragraph 1, in PDF (2021) on page 17
Limitation: 3 years for violations


Anyone who possesses, buys, cultivates, and finally consumes cannabis for themselves is acting illegally, but at the lowest level (transgression). As soon as even a crumb is given away, this is considered to be a misdemeanor. “Self-consumption excludes transfer.” This difference is really central!


The less consumption, cultivation, possession and purchase in the survey confessed, the fewer illegal acts can be punished. The penalty can be higher if a lot has been admitted. No matter how big the Piece is, it is intended only for the own consumption and under no circumstances for the passing on.


Anyone caught with cannabis for personal use or consumption in an interview admits to it, will receive a fine from the penal order with a fine, plus fees (a total of 200 to 1,000 francs). In case of repetition, it becomes more expensive (fine up to 10'000 francs).

Normal illegal: consumption private and preparations

Consumption is prohibited

Acts for one's own consumption (possession, cultivation, purchase, smuggling) as well as consumption itself are prosecuted as misdemeanors.

There is no quantity limit here. It does not matter how much hash or weed someone possesses - as long as it is for personal use, it is considered an infraction and the penalty in the law is “fine”. The only exception to this is if someone possesses less than 10 grams and has not yet consumed it, they go goes unpunished according to the law off.

The procedure in the event of a violation

In 2020, the police reported 22,141 defendants who were accused of 25,203 violations related to smoking pot. An infraction is recorded by the police (see report). The person concerned is then reported to the police, because the police cannot impose fines themselves. In most areas, this is done by the public prosecutor's office.

In the canton of Zurich, there are city police forces in individual municipalities, where THC users are usually reported by them and fined by the city magistrate's office. Those who are reported by the cantonal police are fined by the governor's office. The governor's offices issue higher fines and demand higherfees than the municipal magistrates' offices. The public prosecutor's offices are often even more expensive.

For example, in the city of Zurich: 100 francs fine + 150 francs fees = 250 francs, pronounced by the municipal magistrate's office. This fine is stored in the corresponding office. Whoever is reported again in this area can get a higher fine (for example 200 francs fine + 250 francs fees = 450 francs).

But if you end up at the governor's office, you can expect a fine of, for example, 350 francs and on top of that fees of 300 francs, so one report can cost 650 francs.

The public prosecutor often charges up to 500 francs buses the first time, which can quickly cost 800 francs with fees.

These examples are first time fines. The second time it will be more expensive!

Logging of illegal actions

When someone is stopped by the police for smoking pot, there are the things that are clearly present: a joint, a piece of hash, a bag weed. Here, THC users can hardly deny that these things belong to them.

Next comes the questioning, which is recorded in a protocol. Here, questions are also asked about as yet unproven consumption in the past, as well as about passing on, the name of the dealer, etc. (Example of a protocol).

It is now particularly important that one does not voluntarily confess to further illegal acts to the police. All illegal acts, even those for which one's own statement is the only evidence, can be added up: “Aha, so you admit that you smoke five joints a week, with half a gram each. That means you've consumed 390 grams in the last three years and violated the Narcotics Law 780 times.”

Such extrapolations are rarely made for consumption (but very much so for trafficking), mostly there is a standard fine. But the police and the courts can add it up. The road traffic authorities also have official figures that someone smokes pot regularly, and can therefore question the driver's license with good reason. An ill-considered statement can have negative effects in case of accidents (recourse of the insurance) or when dealing with official authorities.

Silence, silence, silence

Anyone who is questioned by the police about their handling of THC should really only admit what is obvious anyway, i.e. the specific THC-containing material found. Interviewees should not answer any other questions. Interviewees can remain silent or say: “I won't say anything about that.” There is no point in cooperating with the police because every statement almost inevitably proves more illegal activity. Refusing to testify is allowed: No one is forced to incriminate themselves. Accused persons are also allowed to lie. If one's own testimony would be the only evidence, it is often a good idea to simply deny an illegal act. Complex structures of lies, however, usually do not work (contradictions).

Silence, at best denial, is usually better, but difficult for many. It does not make the atmosphere at the post any more pleasant, and perhaps one really does have to go to the holding cell for an hour. It is a very unpleasant situation: to be held and pressured by several armed, paid people in your free time alone. It is not a pleasant experience, but it is necessary to keep one's nerves and remain silent.

The only meaningful statement is that the material found on you belongs to you and is intended for your own consumption. This makes it clear that it is about NarcA 19a. Anything else must then be proven.

The decisive limit

However, anyone who confesses to a transfer leaves the realm of misdemeanors and commits a massively more illegal offense (NarcA 19).

Accordingly, interviewees should submit their statements to the police's police interrogation shape them: Everything you own is for your own consumption. So never admit to passing on or intentions to pass on without compelling reasons, because then there is not “only” a fine, but also a fine or even a prison sentence, both with an entry in the criminal record.

Criminal investigation - rights and obligations

One does not like to deal with it, but it can affect everyone: Even those who are innocent can become involved in criminal proceedings.

Criminal investigation - what to do?

A book recommendation for this: “Criminal investigation - what to do?” has been published by “edition 8” in the 5th edition. For 25 francs you get an understandable, general introduction to the course of criminal proceedings. The ideal supplement to our THC-Wiki. On you can order the book or download a leaflet with a summary of the most important points. For all those who want to know in more detail how a criminal investigation proceeds and what rights and obligations they have in the process.

Rights and obligations in criminal proceedings

If you like it shorter, you can read our summary of the most important points:

How the concrete prosecution of illegal actions is organized is determined by the Criminal Code. Here it is specified how transgressions, how misdemeanor are punished:

prosecution THC use


More on the topic criminal prosecution

Cost of the criminal prosecution

Canton criminal prosecution

In focus

Criminal record

Money Laundering Act

en/thc_recht/normalillegal.txt · Last modified: 2021/10/06 15:11 by fabian
This page was translated automatically. Please report mistakes if you find any!

Share page: facebook Twitter

Legal Aid Brochure

Unfortunately, this brochure is only available in German.

Shit happens, 14th edition summer 2021

Shit happens 14
Order now