Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

en:thc_recht:strafbefehle_2025 [2025/08/19 18:41] – created sosen:thc_recht:strafbefehle_2025 [2026/09/24 13:24] (current) – fabian
Line 11: Line 11:
 No substances were found during the investigation, so driving under the influence of drugs can be ruled out with certainty. The police's suspicions were completely wrong, but the costs of the investigation were still charged in full to the innocent driver: No substances were found during the investigation, so driving under the influence of drugs can be ruled out with certainty. The police's suspicions were completely wrong, but the costs of the investigation were still charged in full to the innocent driver:
  
-| {{:aktuelles:gutachten1.jpeg}} | +| {{:aktuelles:gutachten1.jpeg?direct}} | 
-| {{:aktuelles:gutachten2.jpeg}} | +| {{:aktuelles:gutachten2.jpeg?direct}} | 
-| {{:aktuelles:gutachten3.jpeg}} |+| {{:aktuelles:gutachten3.jpeg?direct}} |
 ^ No substances in the blood at all! ^ ^ No substances in the blood at all! ^
  
-| {{:aktuelles:einstellungseite1k.jpeg}} | +| {{:aktuelles:einstellungseite1k.jpeg?direct}} | 
-| {{:aktuelles:einstellungseite2k.jpeg}} |+| {{:aktuelles:einstellungseite2k.jpeg?direct}} |
 ^ Vague suspicions are enough to pass on the costs. ^ ^ Vague suspicions are enough to pass on the costs. ^
  
Line 26: Line 26:
 Example of an efficient public prosecutor: 21 hemp seeds ordered, the public prosecutor decides not to take action (a rare case to date): Example of an efficient public prosecutor: 21 hemp seeds ordered, the public prosecutor decides not to take action (a rare case to date):
  
-| {{:thc_recht:nichtanhandnahmesamen2025a.jpg}} | +| {{:thc_recht:nichtanhandnahmesamen2025a.jpg?direct}} | 
-| {{:thc_recht:nichtanhandnahmesamen2025b.jpg}} |+| {{:thc_recht:nichtanhandnahmesamen2025b.jpg?direct}} |
  
 ===== Summary penalty order St. Gallen ===== ===== Summary penalty order St. Gallen =====
Line 33: Line 33:
 Example of a public prosecutor who still wants to massively punish even the import of seven hemp seeds (misdemeanor, entry in the criminal register): Example of a public prosecutor who still wants to massively punish even the import of seven hemp seeds (misdemeanor, entry in the criminal register):
  
-| {{:thc_recht:2025hanfsamenvergehena.jpeg}} | +| {{:thc_recht:2025hanfsamenvergehena.jpeg?direct}} | 
-| {{:thc_recht:2025hanfsamenvergehenb.jpeg}} |+| {{:thc_recht:2025hanfsamenvergehenb.jpeg?direct}} |
  
 This is also a good example of how refusing to testify is not always the best strategy. We deal with such questions in our [[en:rechtshilfe/rechtsauskuenfte|legal advice]]. After the objection, the person concerned was questioned by the public prosecutor. There, the person concerned explained that the hemp seeds had been intended for her own consumption. The public prosecutor then changed the summary penalty order to contravention. But the costs remain enormous! This is also a good example of how refusing to testify is not always the best strategy. We deal with such questions in our [[en:rechtshilfe/rechtsauskuenfte|legal advice]]. After the objection, the person concerned was questioned by the public prosecutor. There, the person concerned explained that the hemp seeds had been intended for her own consumption. The public prosecutor then changed the summary penalty order to contravention. But the costs remain enormous!
  
-| {{:thc_recht:2025hanfsamenuebertretunga.jpg}} | +| {{:thc_recht:2025hanfsamenuebertretunga.jpg?direct}} | 
-| {{:thc_recht:2025hanfsamenuebertretungb.jpg}} |+| {{:thc_recht:2025hanfsamenuebertretungb.jpg?direct}} |
  
 The topic of hemp seed prosecutions has been on our minds since 2015. [[samenverfolgung|You can find lots more information here.]] The topic of hemp seed prosecutions has been on our minds since 2015. [[samenverfolgung|You can find lots more information here.]]
Last modified: 2025/08/19 18:41
DEENFR

Legal overview

Shit happens 16 (Summer 2025)

This overview as PDF