Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision		Previous revision
en:thc_recht:strafbefehle_2021 [2021/11/22 16:03] – created sosen:thc_recht:strafbefehle_2021 [2026/09/24 13:18] (current) – fabian
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== penal orders and documents 2021 ======+====== Summary penalty orders and documents 2021 ====== 
 + 
 +====== Five hemp seeds in Zurich ====== 
 + 
 +A classic procedure in the city of Zurich: First comes a letter from the cantonal police because five hemp seeds have been confiscated by customs. It is good here that it is already clear on the letter: It's about NarcA art. 19a, so it's about a contravention (further down on this page you'll find an example from Zurich, where 19ff is written and so it remains open, if it's not about a misdemeanor). 
 + 
 +| {{:thc_recht:2021zh5samenbrief.jpg?direct}} | 
 + 
 +Nevertheless, one must fill out the questionnaire thoughtfully: So order for own consumption! This is the criterion so that the illegal act is only considered a contravention. (If you have the nerve, you can of course try to deny the order and see if they can prove it to you). No previous consumption is admitted here (this would hardly increase the penalty, but can then alert the road traffic office - in general it is bad if there are too many illegal acts in the files). 
 + 
 +| {{:thc_recht:2021zh5samenfragebogen.jpg?direct}} | 
 + 
 +This procedure is then followed by a standard summary penalty order, as can be expected in the city of Zurich: 
 + 
 +| {{:thc_recht:2021zh5samenstrafbefehl.jpg?direct}} |
  
  
Line 9: Line 23:
  
  
-====== penal order Geneva because of hemp seeds ======+====== Summary penalty order Geneva because of hemp seeds ======
  
 Geneva does neither house searches, nor interviews, nor questionnaires in hemp seeds import cases. Here, a fine is simply sent: 500 francs, plus 150 francs fees . A relatively efficient method, but expensive for the victims, who then have to think: Should I contest this and take the risk that it will be even more expensive? Geneva does neither house searches, nor interviews, nor questionnaires in hemp seeds import cases. Here, a fine is simply sent: 500 francs, plus 150 francs fees . A relatively efficient method, but expensive for the victims, who then have to think: Should I contest this and take the risk that it will be even more expensive?
  
-|{{:thc_recht:ordnonnancepenale_geneve_2021_hanfsamen_1.jpg?800&direct|penal order Geneva because of hemp seeds (page 1/2) - CLICK TO ENLARGE}}| +|{{:thc_recht:ordnonnancepenale_geneve_2021_hanfsamen_1.jpg?800&direct|summary penalty order Geneva because of hemp seeds (page 1/2) - CLICK TO ENLARGE}}| 
-|{{:thc_recht:ordonnancepenale_geneve_2021_hanfsamen_2.jpg?800&direct|penal order Geneva because of hemp seeds (page 2/2) - CLICK TO ENLARGE}}|+|{{:thc_recht:ordonnancepenale_geneve_2021_hanfsamen_2.jpg?800&direct|summary penalty order Geneva because of hemp seeds (page 2/2) - CLICK TO ENLARGE}}|
  
  
-====== penal order Bern because of hemp seeds ======+====== Summary penalty order Bern because of hemp seeds ======
  
-Here a penal order, as there is always in Bern, if you ordered hemp seeds. 100 francs buses, 100 francs fees .+Here a summary penalty order, as there is always in Bern, if you ordered hemp seeds. 100 francs fine, 100 francs fees .
  
-|{{:thc_recht:strafbefehl_bern_hanfsamen_2021.jpg?800&direct|penal order Bern because of hemp seeds - CLICK TO ENLARGE}}|+|{{:thc_recht:strafbefehl_bern_hanfsamen_2021.jpg?800&direct|summary penalty order Bern because of hemp seeds - CLICK TO ENLARGE}}|
  
  
-====== house search because of hemp seeds without result ======+====== House search because of hemp seeds without result ======
  
-It has become rarer, but house searches still take place because of the import of hemp seeds. Here in the city of Bern even because of the import of five hemp seeds. Well, the effort with five policemen and a drug dog resulted in nothing at all, as can be seen in the protocol. An enormous effort for - nothing. So that there is even more effort, an identification service was still ordered. Finally, the penal order is in the normal range.+It has become rarer, but house searches still take place because of the import of hemp seeds. Here in the city of Bern even because of the import of five hemp seeds. Well, the effort with five policemen and a drug dog resulted in nothing at all, as can be seen in the protocol. An enormous effort for - nothing. So that there is even more effort, an identification service was still ordered. Finally, the summary penalty order is in the normal range.
  
 |{{:thc_recht:hausdurchsuchung_bern_2021_nichts.jpg?800&direct|house search because of hemp seeds without result (1/4) - CLICK TO ENLARGE}}| |{{:thc_recht:hausdurchsuchung_bern_2021_nichts.jpg?800&direct|house search because of hemp seeds without result (1/4) - CLICK TO ENLARGE}}|
Line 57: Line 71:
  
  
-===== penal order contravention Bern =====+====== Summary penalty order contravention Bern ====== 
 + 
 +Here we see nicely that hemp is simply one of the many illegal drugs and that the law makes no distinction. Even if one possesses different substances, it is only decisive whether one possesses them for personal use (contravention) or passes them on (misdemeanor). Here was a summary penalty order for personal use. The fine with fees is in the usual range. The only special thing is that the person concerned had to spend a day in police custody - until it was clear that it was for personal use. The larger the quantities found/confessed, the more likely one has to experience this. 
 + 
 +|{{:thc_recht:strafbefehl_2021_bern_uebertretungdiv_1.jpg?800&direct|summary penalty order contravention Bern (page 1/2) - CLICK TO ENLARGE}}| 
 +|{{:thc_recht:strafbefehl_2021_bern_uebertretungdiv_2.jpg?800&direct|summary penalty order contravention Bern (page 1/2) - CLICK TO ENLARGE}}| 
 + 
 +====== Destruction order Uster ====== 
 + 
 +Here a few grams of cannabis were seized. Because the amount is less than 10 grams, there is no punishment (minor amount). But the material is confiscated anyway. The justification for this is interesting: they are objects that were intended for the commission of a crime and endanger the safety of people. Therefore, they must be destroyed. I am curious whether the Federal Court will see this the same way (there are similar cases on the way there).
  
-Here we see nicely that hemp is simply one of the many illegal drugs and that the law makes no distinction. Even if one possesses different substances, it is only decisive whether one possesses them for personal use (contravention) or passes them on (misdemeanor). Here was a penal order for personal use. The fine with fees is in the usual range. The only special thing is that the person concerned had to spend a day in police custody - until it was clear that it was for personal use. The larger the quantities found/confessed, the more likely one has to experience this.+| {{:thc_recht:vernichtungsvefuegung_2021_uster.jpg?direct}} |
  
-|{{:thc_recht:strafbefehl_2021_bern_uebertretungdiv_1.jpg?800&direct|penal order contravention Bern (page 1/2) - CLICK TO ENLARGE}}| 
-|{{:thc_recht:strafbefehl_2021_bern_uebertretungdiv_2.jpg?800&direct|penal order contravention Bern (page 1/2) - CLICK TO ENLARGE}}| 
-\\  
Last modified: 2021/11/22 16:03
DEENFR

Legal overview

Shit happens 16 (Summer 2025)

This overview as PDF