Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- en:thc_recht:cbdhanf [2023/10/14 17:42] – [Example of such a criminal case] sos
+++ en:thc_recht:cbdhanf [2024/03/27 08:56] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 69: / Line 69: @@
 But if police or public prosecutor suspect that a hemp product might contain 1% THC or more, they are still allowed to open criminal proceedings. Especially with CBD flowers: They look the same as illegal hemp and also smoking CBD hemp smells the same as consuming illegal flowers. Only a measurement in the laboratory can then provide certainty about the THC content.
-Such criminal proceedings because of legal hemp there were again and again. Consumers received regulatory fines or were reported because of taxed, legal weed. Only after an objection was remeasured, the material returned and a penalty waived. Such criminal proceedings are always tedious, as we will see on the following pages. It takes a long time and costs nerves, even if one is innocent.
+Such criminal proceedings because of legal hemp there were again and again. Consumers received fixed penalties or were reported because of taxed, legal weed. Only after an objection was remeasured, the material returned and a penalty waived. Such criminal proceedings are always tedious, as we will see on the following pages. It takes a long time and costs nerves, even if one is innocent.
 In 2017, the first rapid tests were introduced by some police forces, which are supposed to be able to distinguish THC- from CBD-hemp right on the spot. Thus, there were fewer of these absurd criminal cases for legal CBD hemp.